Bitcoin’s Epic Flash Crash: 13% Plunge, Stablecoin Depegging, and 1.6 Million Liquidations Shake Crypto Markets

6 mins read
October 12, 2025

Bitcoin experienced a 13% flash crash on October 11, 2025, leading to massive liquidations and stablecoin depegging, raising questions about its stability as a reserve asset. – Bitcoin prices plummeted 13% in 24 hours, triggering over $193 billion in liquidations and affecting 1.6 million investors. – Stablecoin USDe depegged by 38%, exposing vulnerabilities in decentralized finance and liquidity mechanisms. – High leverage and speculative capital amplified the crash, reminiscent of historical crypto collapses. – The event challenges Bitcoin’s narrative as a digital gold and highlights its correlation with risk assets. – Investors should reassess risk management strategies and monitor regulatory developments for future stability. In a dramatic turn of events, Bitcoin’s meteoric rise came to a screeching halt on October 11, 2025, as prices nosedived in a stunning Bitcoin flash crash that erased billions in market value within hours. This sudden collapse, occurring just as Deutsche Bank released an optimistic report forecasting Bitcoin’s potential role in central bank reserves by 2030, sent shockwaves through global cryptocurrency markets. The plunge saw Bitcoin tumble over 13% to a low of $105,900, wiping out gains from recent record highs and igniting a cascade of liquidations that forced over 1.6 million investors out of positions. As stablecoins like USDe lost their dollar pegs and decentralized finance protocols faced extreme stress, the episode underscored the inherent volatility and structural risks plaguing digital assets. For institutional investors and financial professionals focused on Chinese equity markets, this Bitcoin flash crash serves as a critical reminder of the interconnectedness between crypto volatility and broader financial stability, emphasizing the need for cautious exposure and robust risk frameworks in an increasingly digitalized economy.

The Anatomy of the Bitcoin Flash Crash

The October 11 Bitcoin flash crash unfolded with breathtaking speed, catching even seasoned traders off guard. Beginning late on October 10, Bitcoin prices spiraled downward from approximately $117,000, breaching the $110,000 support level and accelerating into a freefall that saw values drop by more than $10,000 in mere hours. By the morning of October 11, the damage was clear: a 13.5% decline within 24 hours, marking the most severe sell-off since April and one of the sharpest corrections in crypto history.

Key Market Data and Immediate Impact

The brutality of the Bitcoin flash crash extended beyond Bitcoin itself, engulfing the entire digital asset ecosystem. Ethereum (ETH) plunged over 20% to around $3,380, while major altcoins like Ripple (XRP), Binance Coin (BNB), and Dogecoin suffered losses exceeding 30%. Smaller, less liquid山寨币 (altcoins) experienced catastrophic drops, with some tokens nearly zeroing out in minutes as liquidity evaporated. Data from cryptocurrency analytics platform Coinglass revealed the scale of the devastation: – Total liquidations across crypto markets reached $193.58 billion in 24 hours. – Approximately 1.66 million traders faced forced position closures. – Unreported data from smaller exchanges suggests actual liquidation volumes could have surged between $300 billion and $400 billion, according to crypto analyst MLM. Ram Ahluwalia, founder of investment firm Lumida Wealth, captured the sentiment perfectly: ‘This was a brutal day.’ Veteran traders compared the velocity of the decline to the ‘Black Thursday’ of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting its rarity and intensity in recent market memory.

High Leverage and the Liquidation Cascade

At the heart of this Bitcoin flash crash lay an overreliance on leverage, which transformed a routine correction into a full-blown crisis. In the months leading up to the crash, speculative capital had flooded into crypto markets not through long-term investments but via high-risk instruments like perpetual contracts, crypto lending, and yield farming strategies. These mechanisms built a precarious tower of debt that collapsed at the first sign of trouble.

Mechanisms of the Crash and Historical Parallels

When negative sentiment emerged, overleveraged long positions became the first casualties. As critical technical support levels broke, margin calls triggered automatic liquidations, creating a snowball effect that amplified selling pressure. Qadir, founder of CoinPedia, explained, ‘Fragile altcoin liquidity, excessive leverage, and valuation mismatches collectively brewed a violent deleveraging stampede. Trading bots and algorithms exacerbated the chaos, accelerating the崩盘 (collapse).’ Glassnode had warned earlier in the week about rising leverage ratios and overcrowded bullish positions, signaling mounting vulnerability. This Bitcoin flash crash echoes past crypto disasters, each following a similar script of leverage-induced pain: – The March 12, 2020, ‘312’ crash saw Bitcoin halve in two days amid COVID-19 fears, disproving its ‘digital gold’ narrative as it sold off alongside risk assets. – On February 22, 2021, the ‘222’ crash occurred when rising Treasury yields and critical comments from Tesla CEO Elon Musk sparked a 15% Bitcoin drop and over $60 billion in liquidations. – The May 19, 2021, ‘519’ collapse followed regulatory warnings from Chinese authorities and Tesla’s reversal on Bitcoin payments, causing a 30% intraday plunge. Andreas Adriano, Senior Advisor at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), noted, ‘Cryptocurrency investors often layer leverage through credit card purchases and margin trading, magnifying risk and return volatility. Forced selling during downturns drives prices lower—a pattern seen in everything from tulip mania to the 1929 stock crash and today’s crypto corrections.’

Stablecoin Depegging and DeFi Vulnerabilities

The Bitcoin flash crash exposed critical weaknesses in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, particularly around stablecoins. USDe, a synthetic stable币 (stablecoin) issued by Ethena Labs, deviated sharply from its $1 peg, sinking to $0.62 on some decentralized exchanges—a 38% depegging that rattled confidence in algorithmic stability mechanisms.

USDe’s Collapse and Systemic Risks

The depegging resulted from a perfect storm of factors: – Panic selling and liquidity shortages: As holders rushed to convert USDe into more stable assets like USDT or USDC for margin calls, thin on-chain liquidity buckled under immense sell pressure. – Breakdown of leverage cycles: Many users had employed USDe in recursive lending strategies to amplify yields. When depegging began, the collateral value dropped, triggering margin call discounts and cascading liquidations even on conservative positions. – Correlated asset depegging: USDe’s stability relies on collateral such as ETH and derivative hedges. As ETH prices crashed and liquid staking derivatives like WBETH and BNSOL also depegged, the entire system faced simultaneous stress. Ethena Labs confirmed that minting and redemption functions remained operational during the turmoil, with USDe maintaining over-collateralization. Unrealized gains from perpetual short positions were being realized, potentially boosting collateral ratios. However, the incident highlighted how a single Bitcoin flash crash can test the resilience of entire DeFi ecosystems.

Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset: Reality Check

The Bitcoin flash crash delivered a sobering message about Bitcoin’s suitability for central bank reserves, contradicting optimistic projections. Deutsche Bank’s recent report had suggested Bitcoin could join gold and the dollar as a key reserve asset by 2030, citing growing institutional interest and a potential decline in dollar dominance. Yet, the volatility displayed on October 11 undermines such aspirations. Liu Ying (刘英), a researcher at the Renmin University of China Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, emphasized to Daily Economic News reporters that reserve assets require stability, which Bitcoin’s high leverage, high risk, and high volatility cannot provide. She added, ‘Bitcoin faces transactional structural risks, including susceptibility to hacker attacks, and liquidity issues due to its fixed, algorithmically controlled supply that halves every four years,容易形成通缩 (easily leading to deflation). This event showed liquidity drying up—central banks cannot freely buy or sell Bitcoin assets without facing counterparty challenges.’ Bao Hong (包宏), Assistant Dean of the Hong Kong Chinese University (Shenzhen) Qianhai Institute of International Affairs, noted, ‘Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with U.S. stocks, positioning it as a risk asset. Its long-term correlation with gold is essentially nonexistent.’ Deloitte research further warns that up to 25% of Bitcoin could be vulnerable to quantum computing attacks, posing potential trillion-dollar losses if not addressed.

Investment Implications and Forward Guidance

In the aftermath of the Bitcoin flash crash, markets have stabilized somewhat, with Bitcoin recovering to around $112,000 and 24-hour losses narrowing to 7.5%. However, sentiment has shifted from greed to caution, with期权 (options) markets seeing increased bullish bets as some investors eye a rebound. Yet, the episode reaffirms Bitcoin’s behavior as a high-risk asset rather than a safe haven. Throughout 2025, Bitcoin has moved in lockstep with tech stocks, falling during macroeconomic uncertainty or liquidity tightening—even as gold rallied on避险 (risk-off) sentiment. Fortune magazine aptly described Bitcoin as ‘a typical risk asset, sold off at the first sign of trouble, much like high-yield bonds or emerging market funds.’ For investors, this Bitcoin flash crash underscores several key lessons: – Diversify exposure: Avoid overconcentration in crypto assets, and balance portfolios with traditional hedges like gold or Treasury bonds. – Monitor leverage ratios: Use conservative margin levels and avoid overextending in perpetual contracts or lending protocols. – Stay informed on regulations: Watch for developments from bodies like the中国人民银行 (People’s Bank of China) and other global regulators that could impact market stability. – Assess liquidity carefully: Prefer assets with deep markets and avoid illiquid altcoins that can gap down violently. As the dust settles, the path forward requires a disciplined approach. While crypto innovation continues, this Bitcoin flash crash reminds us that maturity in digital markets is still evolving. Investors should prioritize risk management, conduct thorough due diligence, and remain adaptable to the rapid changes defining this asset class. The events of October 11, 2025, will likely catalyze stricter oversight and improved infrastructure, but until then, caution should guide every decision in the volatile world of cryptocurrency.

Eliza Wong

Eliza Wong

Eliza Wong fervently explores China’s ancient intellectual legacy as a cornerstone of global civilization, driven by a deep patriotic commitment to showcasing the nation’s enduring cultural greatness.