The First Brokerage Loss of 2025: Why Zhongshan Securities Defied Industry Gains

1 min read
July 20, 2025

A Rocky Start Amidst Industry Optimism

The securities industry entered 2025 buoyed by China’s rebounding markets, with major brokerages forecasting powerful growth. Yet July brought an unexpected twist: Zhongshan Securities reported the sector’s first net loss for the first half at CN¥28.11 million ($3.9 million). This brokerage firm’s loss presents a complex counter-narrative to prevailing market optimism, revealing how specialization leaves certain players vulnerable to abrupt market shifts.

Anatomy of the Deficit

The Core Numbers

Zhongshan Securities saw revenue tumble 52% year-on-year to CN¥231 million ($32 million), anchored by four pillars of financial erosion:- Self-operation business revenue collapse (94% plunge)- Investment banking fees disintegration (63% decline)- Asset management income erosion (84% contraction)- Fixed overhead lagging restructuring efforts

Self-Operation Implosion

With trading income plunging 94% to CN¥17.71 million ($2.4 million), this historic profit engine abruptly stalled. Unlike larger competitors with diversified investment portfolios, Zhongshan’s concentrated strategy amplified market volatility impact. This brokerage firm’s loss stemmed significantly from over-reliance on volatile proprietary trading instead of stable fee-based services.

Fee-Based Vulnerabilities

Investment Banking Declines

Investment banking net fees plunged to CN¥5.78 million ($800k) during China’s IPO resurgence – revealing outdated underwriting technology and regulatory weakness following license suspensions in 2023.

Asset Management Struggles

Despite China’s wealth management boom, Zhongshan’s asset fees shriveled to CN¥231,930 ($32k) amid fierce competition and subscale capabilities.

The Brokerage Paradox

Surprisingly, retail brokerage proved resilient:- Commission revenue surged 58% to CN¥123 million ($17 million)- Interest income grew 38% to CN¥61.53 million ($8.5 million)- Cost-efficiency improved through branch consolidation (5 branches closed)

The Parent Company Paradox

Defying its subsidiary’s brokerage firm loss, majority owner Jinlong Co. reported CN¥105-153 million ($14-21 million) net profit. This bifurcated fortune emerged from Jinlong’s strategic divestment – selling $318 million worth of Dongguan Securities shares while retaining 20%. Contrasting Zhongshan’s struggles, Dongguan Securities thrived:- Revenue soared 38% to CN¥1.41 billion ($195 million)- Broking commissions leaped 65% to CN¥746 million ($103 million)- Proprietary income accelerated 72%

Strategic Vulnerabilities Exposed

Zhongshan’s vulnerabilities reflect evolving market dynamics:- Over-specialization leaving insufficient buffers against market shocks- Fee compliance limitations from regulatory penalties- Insufficient transformation amid digitization and product innovation- Late restructuring versus rivals streamlining operationsThis brokerage firm’s loss underscores fundamental truths about securities ecosystem volatility.

The Path Beyond Loss

While the brokerage firm’s loss stings, solutions exist:- Merge branch optimization savings ($2.5 million annualized) into digital transformation- Reclaim investment banking licenses through compliance investments- Form mutual fund joint ventures to diversify income channels- Collaborate with fintech researchers for trading algorithm upgradesPost-loss transformation requires urgency and strategic discipline.

Market Lessons in Selective Prosperity

Zhongshan Securities becomes essential case study demonstrating that macro-recoveries selectively reward institutions prepared with compliance discipline, diversified income channels, and technological modernization.Brokerages must urgently:- Rebalance proprietary trading exposure- Increase electronic execution capabilities- Develop hybrid compensation models- Monitor capital adequacy pressuresFor investors, this brokerage firm’s loss reinforces imperative due diligence in securities selection – aligning with institutions proactively transforming rather than passively awaiting market tides. Early movers in restructuring will capture disproportionate gains when markets fully rebound.

Changpeng Wan

Changpeng Wan

Born in Chengdu’s misty mountains to surveyor parents, Changpeng Wan’s fascination with patterns in nature and systems thinking shaped his path. After excelling in financial engineering at Tsinghua University, he managed $200M in Shanghai’s high-frequency trading scene before resigning at 38, disillusioned by exploitative practices.

A 2018 pilgrimage to Bhutan redefined him: studying Vajrayana Buddhism at Tiger’s Nest Monastery, he linked principles of non-attachment and interdependence to Phoenix Algorithms, his ethical fintech firm, where AI like DharmaBot flags harmful trades.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.